At the end of 2018 I sent an email to @randy and @tristanh to notify them about our discussion in Reflections on CHT header image and slogan and the message it conveys and intent to change our slogan and mission statement to reflect a more restricted, manageable scope and clarity to (new) community members.
With permission and FYI I am copying that email thread below:
Hi Randy, Tristan,
Hope you are doing well! Notifying you on an important development in HT community.
Among moderators we have been discussing the need to clarify the scope in which we operate, and the requirement to restrict it. Having the same mission statement / slogan as the CHT until now: âRealigning Technology to Humanityâs Best Interestsâ is way too broad and vague, and hampering people becoming active in the community, we observed.
A thread that started as a discussion on that statement and the brand perception that comes with it, has turned to an interesting discusson on changing our mission statement.
I have given it some thought and just now came up with a statement that really excites me, and which I have just proposed on the forum:
"Bridging the Gap Between Humans and The Web "
And created an accompanying diagram to show how that all fits together:
I am curious what your take is on this Mission Statement and subsequent repositioning.
Warm regards,
Arnold.
To which Tristan replied:
Hi Arnold, really appreciate all the work youâre doing to continue to build out the community with such passion and vigor. I check in periodically just to see whatâs going on, and have been blown away by how much youâre putting into growing this community and finding ways to plug people in. We would like more of that to happen and I hope you and Randy can discuss that soon.
I realize a lot of people have different grievances w/ what they perceive as whatâs wrong with tech. Weâre most concerned with the way technology is directly and materials impacting every layer of the social fabric, culture and world history⌠by creating autonomous systems that pull indiscriminately on the puppet strings of human nature (both accidentally w/ âslot machineâ-like email, and intentionally, incentivized by the maximize-engagement model). The pen of history is in technologyâs hands, and is increasingly steering elections, conversation, beliefs about ourselves, the world, and our friends, children⌠towards catastrophe in each domain.
Aligning technology with a more compassionate, sensitive and vulnerable model of human nature is what CHT is all about. So I would not include âthe webâ in that statement.
Weâre planning a lot for 2019 and perhaps it would be great for Randy to run by some of the naming & framing work we are doing, because it will be critical to activate and recruit the CHT community around it as well with maximum resonance.
Thank you again for everything youâre doing - and Iâm sorry I havenât been responsive, we are all super swamped here at CHT.
Tristan
Co-founder
Center for Humane Technology
And my response:
Thank you, Tristan, I am glad you like what is going on on the forum
I very much share your concerns in the fields that you mention. The TWS part of the equation is much less important against some of these other trends, and our democracies are in danger.
In the slogan the name âWebâ is used to designate âthe internetâ as a whole. It is similar to how Tim Berners Leeâs Solid applies it in âRe-decentralizing the Webâ, which also encompasses the entire online world. I think the slogan has merit, especially in combination with the more broadly defined CHT slogan. But that argumentation goes a bit too far for an email exchange, I think.
Would love to discuss further on future plans and closer cooperation of community and center. Will probably have its start in 2019, as the year is running out. Give a shout at any time on the forum or by email, and we can set things up.
There is no need at all to be sorry about not being able to be more involved with the community. That is behind us, and I fully understand where you are coming from.
I wish you and Randy a very Merry Christmas!
Cheers,
Arnold.
PS. Do you mind sharing your email with the other active forum moderators? Iâd like to keep them in the loop as much as possible.
Tristanâs response:
Absolutely
We also need a better term for âthe goodâ we want to achieve besides TWS. Currently weâre focused on naming the problem - akin to âtech-accelerated social decayâ - but the even more existential/destabilizing version of that arising from tech supremacy over the weaknesses in human mind. Otherwise âtime well spentâ doesnât feel like an answer to erosion to democracy, mental health, children, etc.
Agree this is bigger discussion - would be best for you and Randy to regroup in new year. I feel we can better point our community at a more concrete problem statement and agenda out of which better self-organizing toward solutions can happen.
Yes fine [about sharing this text] - just know I will rarely be able to respond.
Happy holidays
And finally me again:
Happy New Year!
Back from a small digital detox and vacation. I agree on the shortcomings of TWS and see it as âjust oneâ of the many topics of Humane Technology. Still a very valuable one - an attractor of people to the community - but is not most prevalent.
Also very important in communication and âbrand imageâ (of the community at least) is conveying a solution-oriented approach and positive mindset (i.e. we have very urgent, yet actionable problems). I feel with all the âdoom and gloomâ in the media (the âproblem focusâ) there is a risk of people getting apathetic to our tech harms, and - like with climate change - the issues become âtoo big to handleâ for the average person, and they decide to rather ignore them.
Letâs continue discussions on the forum, any time you and/or Randy are ready
Cheers,
Arnold.