Some time ago I found The Post-Meritocracy Manifesto, on the role of meritocracy on (open-source) software development, but also a concept that plays a role across the entire workforce. I was new to the concept, but very interested to learn more. I created the Dutch translation of the manifest.
I also added the site to the Awesome Humane Technology list, but later came upon the Issue tracker of the corresponding Github project and found - to my surprise - some real offensive, aggressive issues. This kind of thing is very rare on Github.
So I responded to an issue, and got into a real interesting discussion the merits and problems of meritocracy. Fine and well. But today there was another comment, with examples of how deep the controversies really go.
That made me decide that this should be a topic for the Humane Tech Community, to be addressed in future discussions and projects. Here is my response to the comment:
Great, that you bring that to attention! I’ll not take any opinion or side on all of this, but it saddens me to see all the anger and frustration, and - probably - misunderstandings. The issues underlying all of this are complex.
I am, however, convinced that technology, and the way it alters human communication, plays a large role in the severity and tone of these discussions. That is very much a Humane Tech subject of interest, and I will bring it to the attention of our community.
An interesting statement by Mozilla regarding Meritocracy, led me to reach out to Larissa Shapiro - Head of Global Diversity and Inclusion at Mozilla.
This is the blog post I was referring to: https://blog.mozilla.org/inclusion/2018/10/02/words-matter-moving-beyond-meritocracy/
The whole topic of Meritocracy and controversies surrounding it, obviously warrant further investigation and approaches to bring solutions.